Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Interior Electric Inc. Nevada v. T.W.C. Construction, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

January 2, 2020

INTERIOR ELECTRIC INCORPORATED NEVADA, a domestic corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
T.W.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Nevada corporation; TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation; MATTHEW RYBA, an individual; GUSTAVO BAQUERIZO, an individual; CLIFFORD ANDERSON, an individual; POWER UP ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Nevada corporation, dba POWER ON ELECTRIC COMPANY; BAMM ELECTRIC LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; PROLOGIS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; AML PROPERTIES, INC., a Nevada corporation; AML DEVELOPMENT 3, LLC; a Nevada limited liability corporation; LAPOUR PARTNERS, INC., a Nevada corporation; DON FISHER, an individual; PHILCOR T.V. & ELECTRONIC LEASING, INC., a Nevada corporation, dba NEDCO; QED, INC., a Nevada corporation; TURTLE & HUGHES, Inc., a New Jersey corporation; DOES I-X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Defendants. T.W.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Nevada corporation, Counterclaimant
v.
INTERIOR ELECTRIC INCORPORATED NEVADA, a domestic corporation; INTERIOR ELECTRIC, INC., a California corporation; DOES I-X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Counterdefendants.

          Marquis Aurbach Coffing Cody S. Mounteer, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11220 Chad F. Clement, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12192 Jared M. Moser, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13003 Collin M. Jayne, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13899, Law Offices of Philip A. Kantor, P.C. Philip A. Kantor, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6701 Attorneys for Interior Electric Incorporated Nevada and Interior Electric Incorporated

          ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER

         Having considered the factors set forth in F.R.C.P. 53(a)(3), the parties' representations concerning the Action and having given the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard by the Court, the Court hereby appoints Floyd A. Hale. Esq. of JAMS, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 11th Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89169, 702-457-5267, as Special Master in this Action.

         1. Authority for and Scope of Appointment.

         The Special Master is appointed pursuant to F.R.C.P. 53(a)(1)(C) to manage, supervise, and resolve issues related to or arising out of discovery disputes concerning this Action, as the Court finds pursuant to F.R.C.P. 53(a)(1)(C) that current and anticipated discovery disputes between the parties have arisen that the Court cannot timely address. In addition, the Special Master may perform any additional duties consented to by the parties and Court pursuant to F.R.C.P. 53(a)(1)(A).

         (a) Specific Issues Within Scope.

         The Court specifically orders that the Special Master shall be empowered to resolve the non-dispositive discovery disputes, including electronic discovery disputes, in this Action, subject to objections being filed as detailed in subsection 1(b) below, concerning the scope of discovery currently pending (as set forth in ECF Nos. 155, 157, 160, and 162) and the anticipated future discovery disputes that may arise in the Action. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 53(a)(1)(C), the Court finds that these matters cannot be effectively and timely addressed by the Court.

         (b) Objecting to Discovery Decision.

         Any party seeking review of a ruling of the Special Master shall file objections to the District Judge in accordance with the procedures and standards of review and timing set forth in Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) for objecting to decisions by a Magistrate Judge.

         2. Special Master's Duties and Authority.

         The Special Master shall proceed with all reasonable diligence to undertake these responsibilities with a view to avoiding disputes wherever possible and where disputes arise, to resolve them as quickly and inexpensively as possible. The Special Master shall have all of the authority provided to masters as set forth in F.R.C.P. 53(c), including the power to sanction as set forth in F.R.C.P. 53(c)(2).

         (a) Timeframes for Completion of Certain Events.

         Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and the Special Master, the parties shall have an initial meeting with the Special Master, in person or by telephone, within 14 days of the issuance of this Order. During that initial meeting, the parties and the Special Master shall (1) set a date for a hearing concerning the issues set forth in paragraph 1(a) of this Order; (2) the parameters and procedures concerning the aforementioned hearing; (3) the parameters and procedures regarding discovery concerning Electronically Stored Information; (4) the parameters and procedures concerning the handling of future discovery disputes; and (5) the parameters and suggestions to any alteration of the discovery schedule. The Special Master shall issue his order and findings within 14 days of the completion of the hearing.

         3. Ex Parte Communications.

         (a) Wi ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.