Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Goodrich v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Co.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

December 3, 2019

WAYNE C. GOODRICH, individually, Plaintiff,
v.
GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY dba USAA, a foreign entity; DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI-XX, inclusive, Defendants.

          ROBERT W. FREEMAN, PRISCILLA L. O'BRIANT, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company.

          ADAM SMITH LAW, Adam D. Smith, Esq., Craig A. Henderson, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff.

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY DEADLINES PENDING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING (THIRD REQUEST)

         Plaintiff Wayne C. Goodrich and Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to stay discovery as explained below.

         A. Statement specifying the discovery completed.

         1. On December 17, 2018, the parties submitted a joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, and the Court adopted the discovery plan on December 19, 2018.

         2. On December 28, 2019, Plaintiff served his Rule 26 initial disclosure of witness, documents, and damages.

         3. On January 3, 2019, Defendant served its initial disclosure of witnesses, documents, and damages.

         4. On January 4, 2019, Plaintiff served Defendant with interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission.

         5. On February 27, 2019, Defendant served Plaintiff with responses to Plaintiffs written discovery.

         6. On March 5, 2019, Defendant served Plaintiff with interrogatories and requests for production.

         7. On March 7, 2019, Defendant served notices of subpoenas duces tecum on five entities identified in Plaintiffs initial disclosure of witnesses and documents.

         8. On March 7, 2019, Defendant served Plaintiff with supplemental responses to Plaintiffs interrogatories.

         9. On March 14, 2019, Plaintiff served a first supplement to his Rule 26 disclosures.

         10. On March 25, 2019, Defendant's expert performed in inspection of the premises.

         11. On April 3, 2019, Plaintiff served a second supplement to his Rule 26 disclosures.

         12. On April 3, 2019, Plaintiff served a notice of subpoena duces ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.