Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Long

United States District Court, D. Nevada

November 5, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
GARETH DAVID LONG, Defendant.

          PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

          ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Gareth David Long pleaded guilty to Counts 1 and 16 of a 39-Count Criminal Indictment charging him in Count 1 with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and in Count 16 with aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) with 1028A(c)(5). Mr. Long agreed to the forfeiture of property and the imposition of an in personam criminal forfeiture money judgment as set forth in the Plea Agreement and the Forfeiture Allegations of the Criminal Indictment.

         The United States of America has shown the requisite nexus between the property discussed in the Plea Agreement and the Forfeiture Allegations of the Criminal Indictment and the offenses to which Gareth David Long pled guilty. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1), (2).

         The following property and money judgment are real or personal property that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and lO28A(a)(1) with lO28A(c)(5), a specified unlawful activity as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(c)(7)(A) and l96l(1)(B), or a conspiracy to commit such offenses, and are subject to forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(p):

1. $210.32 in United States Currency;
2. $938.01 in United States Currency;
3. $60 in United States Currency;
4. $1, 081.33 in United States Currency;
5. $10, 225.46 in United States Currency;
6. $788, 593.43 in United States Currency;
7. $2, 112, 673.65 in United States Currency;
8. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1350 STONEY CREEK DRIVE, CEDAR HILL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 75104; and

         MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DALLAS, STATE OF TEXAS:

BELNG A 10.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE U. MATTHUSEN 106.50 ACRE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1046, THE WILLIAM NEWBY 198 ACRE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1085, THE WILLIAM C. BILLINGSLEY 60 ACRE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 136, AND THE WILLIAM MASTERS 160 ACRE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 899, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED AS TRACT ONE TO KELLI FREEMAN, AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO. 200503550084, DEED RECORDS OF DALLAS, COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT A FOUND 1/2-INCH IRON ROD AT THE COMMON NORTH CORNER OF SAID TRACT ONE AND THAT CERTAPN TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO DAVID WILLIS AND BARBARA WILLIS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 96021, PAGE 2189, SAID DEED RECORDS, SAID IRON ROD BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF STONEY CREEK ESTATES, AN ADDITION TO DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 83241, PAGE 3281, MAP RECORDS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 16 MTNUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 104.25 FEET ALONG THE COMMON LTNE OF SAID TRACT ONE AND SAID WILLIS ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.