Buy This Entire Record For
Clark County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
United States District Court, D. Nevada
October 2, 2019
CLARK COUNTY, Plaintiff,
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P.; PURDUE PHARMA, INC.; THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. d/b/a THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC.; PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P.; RICHARD S. SACKLER; JONATHAN D. SACKLER, MORTIMER D.A. SACKLER; KATHE A. SACKLER; ILENE SACKLER LEFCOURT; DAVID A. SACKLER; BEVERLY SACKLER; THERESA SACKLER; PLP ASSOCIATES HOLDINGS L.P.; ROSEBAY MEDICAL COMPANY L.P.; BEACON COMPANY; TEVAPHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.;CEPHALON, INC.; ENDO HEALTHSOLUTIONS INC.; ENDOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; PARPHARMACEUTICAL, INC.; PARPHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC.;ALLERGAN INC.; ALLERGAN USA INC.;ACTAVIS, INC. f/k/a WATSONPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; WATSONLABORATORIES, INC.; INSYSTHERAPEUTICS, INC.; JOHN KAPOOR;RICHARD M. SIMON; SUNRISE LEE;JOSEPH A. ROWAN; MICHAEL J. GURRY; MICHAEL BABICH; ALEC BURLAKOFF;MALLINCKRODT LLC; SPECGX LLC;ACTAVIS LLC; AND ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC.;AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUGCORPORATION; CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.; CARDINAL HEALTH 6 INC.;CARDINAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGIESLLC; CARDINAL HEALTH 414 LLC;CARDINAL HEALTH 200 LLC;MCKESSON CORPORATION;WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.;WALGREEN CO.; WALGREEN EASTERNCO., INC.; WALMART INC.; CVS HEALTH CORPORATION; CVS PHARMACY, INC.;CVS INDIANA L.L.C.; CVS RX SERVICES, INC.; CVS TENNESSEE DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C.; MASTERS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC f/k/a MASTERS PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.; C & R PHARMACY d/b/a KEN'SPHARMACY f/k/a LAM'S PHARMACY, INC.; EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDINGCOMPANY; EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.;AIDA B MAXSAM; STEVEN A HOLPERMD; STEVEN A. HOLPER, M.D., PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION;HOLPER OUT-PATIENTS MEDICALCENTER, LTD.; DOES 1 through 100; ROECORPORATIONS 1 through 100 and ZOEPHARMACIES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.
ADAMS ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ., ROBERT M. ADAMS, ESQ., ERICA D.
ENTSMINGER, ESQ, STEVEN B. WOLFSON, ESQ., Counsel for
Plaintiff Clark County.
ASHCRAFT & BARR | LLP, JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ., Counsel for
Defendant Aida Maxsam
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING
RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (FIRST
to LR IA 6-1 and 6-2, and pursuant to LR 7-1, Defendant Aida
Maxsam, ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Clark County
("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, and
respectfully request that the Court stay the filing of a
Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order required by Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(f) and LR 26-l(d), and the conducting of all discovery in
this action, pending this Court's resolution of
Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pursuant to Rules 28 U.S.C.
§ 1447(c) (the "Motion to Remand") (Dkt. No.
7). This is the Parties' first request to stay the filing
of a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order required by
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) and LR 26-l(d), and the conducting of all
discovery, in this action.
September 27, 2018, counsel for Defendant and Plaintiffs
conducted a discovery teleconference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(f) and LR 26-l(d). During this conference, counsel
respectfully agreed that a stay of all further discovery
obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) and LR 26-l(d) is
warranted pending the outcome of the Motion to Remand, and
that said stay will preserve valuable judicial resources,
party resources, and time pending resolution thereof.
Court denies the Motion to Remand, in whole or in part, the
Parties agree to submit a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order
within thirty (30) days after entry of the Court's order
on the Motion to Remand.
other recently added Defendants have filed Answers in this
action, no other parties are affected by this Stipulation and
foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully suggest that good
cause exists to grant the Parties' stipulated stay of
discovery. The undersigned represent this stipulation is not
intended for purposes of delay. If the Court deems it useful,
the Parties are prepared to conduct a hearing on this
stipulated request pursuant to LR 78-1.
IS SO ORDERED.
HEREBY ORDERED that a status conference is scheduled for
10:00 AM, February 3, 2020, in Courtroom 3D.
 Defendant and Plaintiffs are
hereinafter jointly referred to as the