Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Carter

United States District Court, D. Nevada

August 26, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
RANDY CARTER, Defendant.

          NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney District of Nevada Nevada Bar Number 13644 LINDA MOTT Assistant United States Attorney Representing the United States of America

          MARGARET LAMBROSE Counsel for Defendant Randy Carter

          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (ECF 26) (FIRST REQUEST)

          RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States hereby motions, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Linda Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Maggie Lambrose, Assistant Federal Public Defender, that the deadline of August 26, 2019, for the government to file its Response be extended for an additional day to August 27, 2019.

         The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

         1. A Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Motion to Suppress Evidence (ECF 26) was filed on August 12, 2019. Counsel for the government is investigating the numerous claims that were raised in Defendant's motion, specifically the time at which officers arrived on scene.

         2. Counsel for the government requests the additional day to further investigate the claims and, if so needed, bring any issues to the attention of supervisors.

         3. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow counsel for both the government and defense to prepare for any evidentiary hearing, and to further discuss any possible resolution to the case.

         4. The defendant is in custody and agrees to the additional one day.

         5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), when considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv). In addition, the continuance sought is not for delay and the ends of justice are in fact served by the granting of such continuance which outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         6. This is the first stipulation to continue filed herein.

         FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

         FINDINGS OF FACT

         Based on the pending stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.