Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

eTouch LV, LLC v. eTouch Menu, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

July 15, 2019

eTouch LV, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff,
v.
eTouch Menu, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; SCOTT MORROW, and individual; and DOES 110, inclusive, Defendants. eTouch Menu, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; SCOTT MORROW, and individual; Counter-Claimants
v.
eTouch LV, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Counter-Defendant.

          Robert S. Larsen, Esq., Jing Zhao, Esq., Wing Yan Wong, Esq., GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP Attorneys for eTouch Menu, Inc. and Scott Morrow

          John Bragonje, Esq., Jennifer K. Hostetler, Esq., Brian D. Blakeley, Esq., LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Attorneys for eTouch LV, LLC

          F. THOMAS EDWARDS, ESQ., HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON Attorneys for eTouch Menu, Inc. and Scott Morrow

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING MEDIATION

         Plaintiff/Counter-defendant eTouch LV, LLC and Defendants/Counterclaimants eTouch Menu, Inc. and Scott Morrow (collectively as “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court stay discovery pending completion of the parties' private mediation currently scheduled for August 21-22, 2019 with (Ret.) Judge Philip Pro of JAMS. The Parties believe the proposed stay is in the Parties' and the Court's interests of costs and efficiency.

         In support of this request, the Parties provide the following information for the Court's consideration:

         1. This action includes competing claims filed by eTouch LV, LLC, on the one hand, and eTouch Menu, Inc. and Scott Morrow, on the other. See ECF No. 54, 56. Additionally, this dispute also includes an arbitration pending before the American Arbitration Association. See ECF No. 55.

         2. The Parties have engaged in substantial discovery including but not limited to the following:

a. The Parties exchanged their initial disclosures.
b. eTouch Menu served its first set of requests for production on eTouch LV, LLC. eTouch LV, LLC served its responses to the same.
c. eTouch LV, LLC served its first set of requests for admission, requests for production, and interrogatories on eTouch Menu, Inc. eTouch Menu, Inc. served its responses to the same.
d. eTouch LV, LLC served its first set of requests for production and interrogatories on Scott Morrow. Scott Morrow served his responses to the same.
e. eTouch Menu recently served its second set of requests for production to eTouch LV, LLC. eTouch LV, LLC's responses are not yet due.
f. Scott Morrow recently served his first set of interrogatories to eTouch LV, LLC. eTouch LV, LLC's responses are not yet due.
g. Collectively, the Parties have produced approximately 2.5 million pages of documents. h. The Parties are meeting and conferring regularly regarding several discovery issues. i. eTouch LV, LLC served its notice of intent to serve subpoenas for documents on twenty (20) third ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.