Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rockhill Insurance Companies v. CSAA Insurance Exchange

United States District Court, D. Nevada

June 21, 2019

ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Plaintiff,
v.
CSAA INSURANCE EXCHANGE D/B/A AAA INSURANCE EXCHANGE; PREMIER RESTORATION AND REMODEL, INC. Defendants.

          DANIEL T. HAYWARD (SBN 5986) LAXALT & NOMURA, LTD. ADAM H. FLEISCHER (Illinois Bar No. 6224928) (admitted pro hac vice) JOHN A. HUSMANN (Illinois Bar No. 6273392) (admitted pro hac vice) JOANNA G. SWARTOUT (Illinois Bar No. 6305993) (admitted pro hac vice) BATESCAREY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff, Rockhill Insurance Companies

          THE GRUNSKY LAW FIRM PC FREDERICK H. EBEY(CA BN 33802) (admitted pro hac vice) In Association With: SCOTT A. GLOGOVAC Glogovac Law LLC Attorneys for Defendants CSAA Insurance Exchange

          ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME BY WHICH PARTIES MAY FILE RESPONSES AND REPLIES RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE (FIRST REQUEST)

         Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Rockhill Insurance Company (“Rockhill”) and Defendant CSAA Insurance Exchange d/b/a AAA Insurance Exchange (“CSAA”), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, stipulate and request that the Court order as follows:

         Rockhill's Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 88)

         Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Defendant CSAA may have until and including July 3, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Plaintiff Rockhill have until and including July 29, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, Rockhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on Rockhill's Amended Complaint. Rockhill's Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on June 6, 2019. Without the foregoing extension, CSAA's Response is due on June 27, 2019, and Rockhill's Reply is due on July 11, 2019. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings related to Rockhill's Motion for Summary Judgment.

         CSAA's Motion For Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 90)

         Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, further stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Plaintiff Rockhill may have until and including July 3, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Defendant CSAA have until and including July 29, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, CSAA's Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Rockhill's Amended Complaint. CSAA's Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment was filed on June 7, 2019. Without the foregoing extension, Plaintiff Rockhill's Response would be due on June 28, 2019, and Defendant CSAA's Reply is due on July 12, 2019. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings related to CSAA's Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment.

         Rockhill's Motion to Strike Affidavit Of Jeffrey Stempel (ECF No. 99)

         Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, further stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Defendant CSAA may have until and including July 8, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Plaintiff Rockhill have until and including July 17, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, Rockhill's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA's Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel. Rockhill's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA's Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel was filed on June 12, 2019. Defendant CSAA's Response is presently due on June 26, 2019. Plaintiff Rockhill's Reply is presently due on July 3, 2019. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings related to Rockhill's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA's Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel.

         This case is not presently scheduled for trial, such that the extensions of the briefing schedules will not impact any trial date. The parties have requested additional time within which to file their responsive pleadings to avoid the concentration of nearly overlapping deadlines, and to align the deadlines for the competing Motions for Summary Judgment. Additionally, counsel for Plaintiff, who are principally responsible for drafting its Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Rockhill's Amended Complaint and its Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA's Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel are scheduled to be out of the office during the weeks of July 1-5, 2019 and July 8-12, 2019.

         WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the Court order that the parties may extend their deadlines as specified above and summarized below.

         1. Rockhill's Motion for Summary Judgment CSAA's Response due July 3 Rockhill's Reply due July 29

         2. CSAA's Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment Rockhill's Response due July 3 CSAA's Reply due July 29

         3. Rockhill's Motion to Strike CSAA's Response due July 8 Rockhill's Reply due July 17 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.