Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Milne

United States District Court, D. Nevada

May 8, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
KEVIN MILNE, Defendant.

          NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney CHRISTOPHER BURTON Assistant United States Attorney

          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (SECOND REQUEST)

          THE HONORABLE ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, United States Attorney, and CHRISTOPHER BURTON, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and ERIN GETTEL, counsel for Defendant KEVIN MILNE, that the sentencing currently scheduled for May 9, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., in the above-captioned matter, be vacated and continued to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court but no sooner than 30 days.[1]

         This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

         1. On May 2, 2019, Milne filed his sentencing memorandum, which included a psychological report as a sealed exhibit. Milne provided the government a copy of the sealed exhibit the same day.

         2. In reviewing the sealed exhibit, it appears Milne was administered two psychological inventories as part of his psychological evaluation.

         3. On May 3, 2019, the government requested defense provide all underlying testing materials, to include the raw test scores and data as well as question materials.

         4. On May 6, 2019, Milne provided the government with scantrons containing his answers as well as his raw test scores, but declined to provide the questioning materials and offered internet links to websites where the materials could be purchased.

         5. The government needs additional time to secure the question materials to provide context to the answers provided by counsel as well as consult with a rebuttal expert in preparation for sentencing.

         6. The defendant is currently out of custody and does not object to the continuance.

         7. The parties agree to the continuance.

         8. Further, the additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow counsel for government sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and completely investigate the discovery materials being provided.

         9. This is the second request to continue the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.