Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Federal Trade Commission v. AWS, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nevada

April 4, 2019

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
AWS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; ADAMS CONSULTING, LLC, a California limited liability company; FBA DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company; FBA STORES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; GLOBAL MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability company; INFO PROS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; INFO SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; ONLINE AUCTION LEARNING CENTER, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; ONLINE AUCTION LEARNING CENTER, INC., a Nevada corporation; CHRISTOPHER F. BOWSER; ADAM S. BOWSER; JODY L. MARSHALL; and JEFFREY A. GOMEZ, Defendants.

          Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP Attorney for defendants Adams Consulting, LLC, Global Marketing Services L.L.C, and Jeffrey A. Gomez

          Illinois Bar # 6270874 (Admitted pursuant to LR IA 11-3) Miry Kim Washington Bar # 31456 (Admitted pursuant to LR IA 11-3) Gregory J. Evans DC Bar # 1033184 (Admitted pursuant to LR IA 11-3) Federal Trade Commission Attorneys for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

         STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE DUE DATE OF THE SETTLEMENT PAYMENT REQUIRED BY THE STIPULATED ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS ADAMS CONSULTING, LLC, GLOBAL MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C., AND JEFFREY A. GOMEZ

          HONORABLE JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         This matter comes before the Court upon the stipulation of the plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and defendants Adams Consulting, LLC, Global Marketing Services L.L.C., and Jeffrey A. Gomez (collectively “Gomez Defendants”) for extension of the due date of the settlement payment required by the Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment entered on October 10, 2018 [ECF 107] (“Settlement Order”). The FTC and the Gomez Defendants, each of which is represented by counsel for purposes of this stipulation, HEREBY STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING:

         1. On October 10, 2018, the Court entered the Settlement Order as to the Gomez Defendants.

         2. The Settlement Order requires, among other things, that the Gomez Defendants pay the FTC One Million, Two-Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1, 250, 000) within 180 days of the entry of the Settlement Order, which is April 8, 2019.

         3. The Settlement Order requires, among other things, that the Gomez Defendants provide the FTC liens on, and security interests in, real and personal property until full payment of the settlement amount.

         4. On February 15, 2019, through counsel, the Gomez Defendants requested an extension of the due date for the payment required by the Settlement Order.

         5. Through counsel, the Gomez Defendants informed the FTC that Defendant Jeffrey A. Gomez needs additional time to facilitate the sale of real property in Upland, CA, and that the Gomez Defendants will use the proceeds of that sale to pay in full the $1, 250, 000 they owe to the FTC under the Settlement Order.

         6. The FTC and the Gomez Defendants stipulate and agree to extend the due date of the payment required by the Settlement Order to July 31, 2019.

         7. In addition to the security specified in Section III C. of the Settlement Order, the Gomez Defendants, individually and on behalf of their respective successors, assigns, and all other related persons and entities reflected on the title of, or otherwise asserting a lien, mortgage, deed of trust, assignment, pledge, security interest, or other interest in the real property located at 271 Ashbury Lane in Upland, California, hereby grant to the FTC liens on, and security interests in, the real property located at 271 Ashbury Lane in Upland, California, described in Attachment A to this Stipulation, together with all dwelling houses, other structures, improvements, appurtenances, hereditaments, and other rights appertaining or belonging thereto, or which hereafter may be added or attached thereto, and all replacements, substitutions therefor or thereto, and proceeds thereof, whether presently existing or hereafter arising.

         8. All other parts of the Settlement Order shall remain unchanged and in full effect, including all liens and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.