Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

International Game Technology v. Illinois National Insurance Co.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

July 5, 2018

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT-UK GROUP LIMITED Plaintiffs,
v.
ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. Defendant.

          John D. Shugrue, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin B. Dreher, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) REED SMITH LLP and Andrew F. Dixon, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 8422 BOWLER DIXON & TWITCHELL LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs, INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT-UK GROUP LIMITED

          Amy M. Samberg Nevada Bar No. 10212 FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC Justin S. Hepworth Nevada Bar No. 10080 Casey G. Perkins Nevada Bar No. 12063 FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC Attorneys for Defendant ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

         Plaintiffs International Game Technology and IGT-UK Group Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Illinois National Insurance Co. (“INIC”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request for good cause showing that the Court extend the deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions in this action by approximately sixty (60) days from Tuesday, July 10, 2018 to Monday, September 10, 2018. The parties also jointly request that the Court defer ruling on Plaintiffs' June 12, 2018 Motion to Compel Defendant to Produce Documents (Dkt. 79) pending the parties' settlement negotiations. If the parties are unable to reach a settlement, they will jointly advise the Court so that the motion may then be considered and ruled upon.

         This is the first request by any party since the close of discovery to specifically extend the deadline to file dispositive motions and the sixth overall request by any party to amend any case management deadlines in this matter.

         As required by Local Rule 26-4, the parties state as follows:

         I. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE

• The parties conducted the Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) conference.
• The parties have exchanged initial and supplementary disclosures of documents and lists of witnesses, including the exchange of tens of thousands of pages of documents. . Plaintiffs propounded multiple requests for production of documents, to which INIC responded.
• INIC propounded requests for production of documents and interrogatories on Plaintiffs, to which Plaintiffs have responded.
• Plaintiffs propounded multiple sets of interrogatories and requests for admission on INIC to which INIC has responded.
• INIC propounded requests for admission and additional requests for production of documents to which Plaintiffs responded.
• Plaintiffs have taken the depositions of INIC pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) as well as four current and former claim handlers, a claim supervisor, a former underwriter, and the Global Head of Financial Lines - Specialty Claims.
• INIC has taken the deposition of Plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) as well as two of Plaintiffs' employees, Senior Legal Counsel for IGT-UK and ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.