Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC v. Metalast International, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

April 5, 2018

CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff,
v.
METALAST INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada corporation; METALAST, INC., a Nevada corporation; SIERRA DORADO, INC., a Nevada corporation; DAVID M. SEMAS, an individual; GREG D. SEMAS, an individual; and WENDI SEMAS-FAURIA, an individual. Defendants. DAVID M. SEMAS; and METALAST INTERNATIONAL, INC., Counterclaimants,
v.
CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, DEAN S. MEILING; and MADYLON MEILING, Counter Defendants. CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff,
v.
MHA GROUP, a company; and MARC HARRIS, an individual. Defendants.

          ROBERT C. RYAN, TAMARA REID HOLLAND & HART LLP CHRISTOPHER B. HADLEY, DART, ADAMSON & DONOVAN ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER DEFENDANTS

          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE [FIRST REQUEST]

         Plaintiff/Counter defendants CHEMEON Surface Technology and Counter Defendants Dean S. Meiling and Madylon Meiling (collectively “CHEMEON”), by and through their undersigned counsel, Robert C. Ryan of Holland & Hart, LLP; Defendants Metalast International, Inc., Metalast, Inc., Sierra Dorado, Inc., David M. Semas, and Counterclaimants Metalast International, Inc. and David M. Semas (collectively “Metalast Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, Michael D. Hoy of Hoy Chrissinger Kimmel Vallas, PC, stipulate and agree as follows:

         1. The Court entered its Order (ECF No. 398) concerning three motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 313, 314, 331) on March 30, 3018.

         2. The Order directed CHEMEON and the Metalast Defendants to provide supplemental briefing within seven (7) days of the Order.

         3. Pursuant to the Order, the supplemental briefing is due April 6, 2018.

         4. The parties agree to a short extension to April 10, 2018, within which to file the supplemental briefs.

         5. This extension is agreed to and requested from the Court because counsel for Plaintiff has had matters requiring immediate action this week which has impacted the ability to finalize the briefing required by this Court. Counsel for the Metalast Defendants has no objection to the short extension.

         6. This is the first request for an extension of time to file the supplemental briefs.

         7. This request for an extension is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

         PROOF OF SERVICE

         Pursuant to FRCP 5, I, Gay Groves, declare, as follows:

         I am employed in the City of Reno, County of Washoe, State of Nevada, by the law offices of Holland & Hart. My business address is 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor, Reno, Nevada 89511. I am ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.