United States District Court, D. Nevada
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff,
PALM HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; VERN ELMER; and NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. Defendants. VERN ELMER, an individual, Counterclaimant,
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a National Association; DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive. Counterdefendants.
GERRARD COX LARSEN Douglas D. Gerrard, Esq. Nevada Bar No.
4613 Nathan R. Henderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13145 Attorneys
for Plaintiff / Counterdefendant Bank of America, N.A.
ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. Brandon E. Wood, Esq. Nevada Bar
No. 12900 Attorney for Defendant Nevada Association Services,
ORME & TAYLOR Edward D. Boyack, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5229
Colli C. McKiever, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13724 Attorney for
Defendant Palm Hills Homeowners Association
LAW, PLLC Luis A. Ayon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9752 Attorneys
for Defendant/Counterclaimant, Vern Elmer
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY
DEADLINES [SECOND REQUEST]
to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (“BANA”), by and through
its attorneys Gerrard Cox Larsen; Defendant PALM HILLS
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., (“Palm Hills HOA”)
by and through its attorneys Boyack Orme & Anthony;
Defendant NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.
(“NAS”), by and thorough its attorney, Brandon E.
Wood, Esq.; and Defendant/Counterclaimant VERN ELMER
(“Elmer”), by and through his attorneys, Ayon Law
PLLC (collectively, the “Parties”); hereby
stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the Court, to
extend the discovery deadline set out in the Stipulation and
Order to Extend Discovery Deadlines [First Request] dated
October 16, 2017 [ECF No. 48], as further set forth herein.
INTRODUCTION AND RELEVANT PROCEDURAL
Match 18, 2016, BANA filed its Complaint in this case. [ECF
April 7, 2016, Palm Hills HOA filed its Answer. [ECF No. 9].
April 25, 2016, NAS filed its Answer. [ECF No. 14].
April 22, 2016, BANA served its Initial Disclosures of
Witness and Documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(A)(1).
17, the Parties submitted their proposed Joint Discovery Plan
and Scheduling Order, and on May 18, 2016, the Court entered
its Order approving the same. [ECF No. 23].
20, 2016, Elmer filed his Answer and a Counterclaim against
BANA. [ECF No. 31].
27, 2016, BANA filed its Answer to the Counterclaim. [ECF No.
August 19, 2016, the Court, sua sponte, entered its
Order Temporarily Staying the Case, pending the Ninth Circuit
issuing a mandate in Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells
Fargo Bank, NA (the "Stay Order") [ECF No.
December 14, 2016, the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate in
Bourne Valley. And on June 26, 2017, the United
States Supreme Court denied the Bourne Valley
petition to the ...