Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Nordt Development Co. LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

February 8, 2018

IN RE: NORDT DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC, Appellant

         Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/241, 865.

          Jeremy Cooper Doerre, Tillman Wright PLLC, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellant.

          Joseph Gerard Piccolo, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, William LaMarca.

          Before Moore, Taranto, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

          Stoll, Circuit Judge.

         Nordt Development Co., LLC appeals the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision affirming an examiner's rejection of claims 1 and 14 of U.S. Patent Application No. 13/241, 865. Ex Parte Nordt, No. 2015-001233, 2016 WL 6560183 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 1, 2016). For the reasons below, we disagree with the Board's claim construction of "injection molded" as a process limitation with no patentable weight, vacate the Board's finding of anticipation, and remand for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion.

         Background

         The '865 application is directed to an elastic knee brace having a framework (106) and a hinge (108) with a strut (112) and arm components (114, 116). Application Figure 1 is shown below and illustrates a side perspective view of the front of the knee brace. The elastic nature of the knee brace allows for and aids in the flexing of the knee.

         (IMAGE OMITTED)

         Claim 1 is representative of the two claims at issue on appeal:

1. A support for an area of a body that includes a hinge joint, comprising:
(a) a hinge mechanism comprising an injection molded strut component and injection molded first and second arm components;
(b) an elastically stretchable framework injection molded about the strut and arm components of the hinge mechanism, the framework being configured to extend across the hinge joint of the area of the body, and the framework defining a flexible, elastically stretchable web of elastomeric interconnecting members;
(c) wherein the first arm component is connected to the strut component such that the first arm component is rotatable relative to the strut component ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.