Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Laforge v. Richland Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

November 17, 2017

STEPHEN LAFORGE and BUNNY LAFORGE, Plaintiffs,
v.
RICHLAND HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a ACCTCORP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, a Nevada Corporation; R.C. WILLEY aka RC WILLEY FINANCIAL SERVICES, and RANDALL CORPORATION d/b/a Bowen Law Offices; CALEB J. LANGSDALE, ESQ. dba The LANGSDALE LAW FIRM, P.C., Defendants.

          THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON, VERNON A. NELSON, JR., ESQ., MARGARET FOLEY, ESQ., JOHN SKALAK, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Stephen Laforge and Bunny Laforge

          MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING, TERRY A. COFFING, ESQ., CHAD F. CLEMENT, ESQ., JARED M. MOSER, ESQ. Attorneys for Richland Holdings, Inc., dba AcctCorp of Southern Nevada and RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services

          ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY, STEPHEN J. ERIGERO, ESQ., TIMOTHY J. LEPORE, ESQ., Attorneys for The Langsdale Law Firm, P.C.

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE

          CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         Pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, Defendants Richland Holdings, Inc. d/b/a AcctCorp of Southern Nevada (“AcctCorp”); RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services (“RC Willey”); Randall Corporation d/b/a Bowen Law Offices (“Bowen”); and The Langsdale Law Firm, P.C. (“Langsdale”) (collectively, “Defendants”), and Plaintiffs Stephen LaForge and Bunny LaForge (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. On March 17, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint against Defendants. See ECF No. 1.

         2. On April 10, 2017, Langsdale filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. See ECF No. 9.

         3. On April 28, 2017, AcctCorp filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, or in the alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement. See ECF No. 14. RC Willey, Bowen, and Langsdale subsequently filed joinders to AcctCorp's Motion to Dismiss. See ECF Nos. 18, 19, & 23.

         4. On May 3, 2017, Langsdale filed its Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Errata to their Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 22.

         5. On May 24, 2017, this Court entered a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (“Scheduling Order”). See ECF No. 35. The Scheduling Order set a discovery cut-off date of October 9, 2017. In addition, the Scheduling Order set the dispositive motion deadline for November 8, 2017. See id.

         6. On October 12, 2017, the Court entered an Order on the parties' first request to modify the Scheduling Order, which subsequent Order extended the discovery cutoff, to conduct discovery referenced therein, to November 9, 2017. See ECF No. 42. That subsequent Order also extended the dispositive motion deadline to December 9, 2017. See Id. Therefore, this is the parties' second request to modify the Scheduling Order.

         7. According to Local Rule 26-4(a), the parties have completed the following discovery:

a. The parties have served their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.