Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bank of America, N.A. v. Falcon Pointe Association

United States District Court, D. Nevada

October 26, 2017

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, Plaintiff,
v.
FALCON POINTE ASSOCIATION; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; and RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Defendants. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Counter/Cross-Claimant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor by merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; MARK COWENS, an individual; and MELANIE GIESE, an individual, Counter/Cross-Defendants. FALCON POINTE ASSOCIATION, Cross-claimant,
v.
RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Cross-Defendant.

          ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ., JAMIE K. COMBS, ESQ., Akerman LLP., Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP.

          KOCH & SCOW LLC, DAVID R. KOCH, ESQ., STEVEN B. SCOW, BRODY R. WIGHT, ESQ., Attorneys for defendant and cross-defendant Red Rock Financial Services, LLC.

          KIM GILBERT EBRON, DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ., JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ., KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ., Attorneys for defendant, counterclaimant and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC.

          PENGILLY LAW FIRM, JAMES W. PENGILLY, ESQ., ELIZABETH B. LOWELL, ESQ., Attorneys for defendant Falcon Pointe Association.

          STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

         Subject to the approval of the Court, plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, defendant and cross-claimant Falcon Point Association, defendant and cross-defendant Red Rock Financial Services, LLC, and defendant, counterclaimant and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC stipulate to the following Protective Order:

         To expedite the flow of discovery, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, adequately protect material claimed to be confidential, and ensure protection is afforded only to material so designated, it is, pursuant to the Court's authority under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c), ORDERED this Protective Order shall govern the disclosure, handling and disposition of documents in this litigation as follows:

         1. Application.

         1.1 This Protective Order shall govern any document, information or other material that is designated as containing "Confidential Information" as defined herein, and is produced in connection with this litigation by any person or entity (the "producing party"), whether in response to a discovery request, subpoena or otherwise, to any other person or entity (the "receiving party") regardless of whether the person or entity producing or receiving such information is a party to this litigation.

         1.2 The party who asserts that particular information should be treated as Confidential Information under this Protective Order has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection.

         2. Definitions.

         2.1 Confidential Information. "Confidential Information" shall mean and include, without limitation, any non-public information that concerns or relates to the following areas: confidential proprietary information, trade secrets, practices and procedures, personal financial information, commercial, financial, pricing, budgeting, and/or accounting information, information about existing and potential customers, marketing studies, performance projections, business strategies, decisions and/or negotiations, personnel compensation, evaluations and other employment information, and confidential proprietary information about affiliates, parents, subsidiaries and third-parties with whom the parties to this action have or have had business relationships.

         2.2 Documents. As used herein, the term "documents" includes all writings, records, files, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, e-mails, video tapes, audio tapes, compact discs, electronic messages, other data compilations from which information can be obtained and other tangible things subject to production under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

         3. Initial Designation.

         3.1 Good Faith Claims. Claims of confidentiality will be made only with respect to documents, other tangible things and information that the asserting party has a good faith belief are within the definition set forth in subparagraph 2.1 of this Protective Order. Objections to such claims made pursuant to paragraph 5, below, shall also be made only in good faith.

         3.2 Produced Documents. A party producing documents that it believes constitute or contain Confidential Information shall state that the material is being produced under this Protective Order by describing the documents or materials to be treated as confidential in writing, by page or bates number wherever possible and/or shall produce copies bearing a label that contains or includes language substantially identical to the following:

         CONFIDENTIAL

         This label shall be affixed in a manner that does not obliterate or obscure the contents of the copies. If any person or party makes copies of documents designated as containing Confidential Information, the copying person or party shall mark each such copy as containing Confidential Information in the same form as the Confidentiality notice on the original document.

         A party producing documents that are stored on electronic, magnetic, optical or other non-paper media, such as compact discs, DVD's, video tapes and audio tapes (collectively, "data storage devices") shall designate the data storage device as containing Confidential Information, by affixing a label or stamp to the data storage device in the manner described above at the time copies of such data storage devices are produced. If the receiving party or other persons or entities to whom disclosure is authorized pursuant to subparagraph 7.1 make a copy of any data storage device designated by the producing party as containing Confidential Information, the receiving party or other authorized person shall mark each such copy as containing Confidential Information in the same form as the confidentiality notice on the original data storage device produced. If the receiving party or other authorized person prints ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.