Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Torosyan

United States District Court, D. Nevada

August 24, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
VIRAB TOROSYAN, Defendant.

          RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender

          MONIQUE KIRTLEY Assistant Federal Public Defender

          STEVEN W. MYHRE Acting United States Attorney

          KILBY MACFADDEN Assistant United States Attorney

          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 82] (SECOND REQUEST)

          RENE L. VALLADARES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Kilby Macfadden, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United Stated of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Monique Kirtley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Virab Torosyan, that the Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 82) be extended fourteen (14) days, from the presently set date of August 17, 2017.

         The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. On June 20, 2017, the Magistrate Court held a Motion Hearing regarding defendant's Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 76). The Magistrate Court filed its Report and Recommendation on July 28, 2017. (ECF. No. 82).
2. On August 8, 2017, Defense counsel ordered the transcript from the Motion to Suppress Hearing. Defense counsel received the transcript on August 17, 2017. Defense counsel needs time to finish her objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 82).
3. The defendant is incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.
4. The parties agree to the continuance.
5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for the defendant sufficient time review the transcript of the Motion Hearing and to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation.
6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, ยง 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.