Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Coury v. Eldorado Resorts Corp.

United States District Court, D. Nevada

April 11, 2017

RAYMOND COURY Plaintiff,
v.
ELDORADO RESORTS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation; MICHAEL MARRS; KRISTEN BECK; DOMINIC TALEGHANI; AND DOES 1-50, inclusive; Defendants.

          WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP Daniel R. Watkins Brian S. Letofsky Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond Coury

          OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Anthony L. Martin Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation, Michael Marrs, Kristen Beck and Dominic Taleghani

          ANTHONY L. MARTIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8177 anthony.martin@ogletreedeakins.com

          JILL GARCIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7805 jill.garcia@ogletreedeakins.com Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation, Michael Marrs, Kristen Beck, and Dominic Taleghani

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO (SECOND REQUEST)

          Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff Raymond Coury (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation (“Eldorado”), Michael Marrs (“Marrs”), Kristen Hayde (formerly known as Beck) (“Hayde”), and Dominic Taleghani (“Taleghani”) (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this second request for extension of time for the parties to file dispositive motions in this action, along with related responses and replies. Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions, and Responses (First Request) (ECF No. 38), the current deadline for filing dispositive motions in this case is April 13, 2017. The parties have completed all discovery in this matter and good cause exists for the proposed extension based upon the following:

         As the Court is aware, this case is one of over thirty related lawsuits sitting before this Court. Recognizing the complexity of litigating these lawsuits simultaneously, the parties agreed to divide the cases into five groups and stagger deadlines in order to streamline the litigation process and avoid overlapping dispositive motion deadlines. On February 8, 2017, the parties agreed to a comprehensive briefing schedule for dispositive motions in the remaining groups of cases. (ECF No. 38.) The current status of the comprehensive briefing schedule is as follows:

         Group III(A)

         • Defendants shall file dispositive motions by February 27, 2017.

         • Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by March 29, 2017.

         • Defendants shall file replies by April 28, 2017.

         Group III(B)

         • Defendants shall file dispositive motions by March 23, 2017.

         • Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by April 24, 2017.

         • Defendants shall file replies by May 24, 2017.

         Group ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.