Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Beck

United States District Court, D. Nevada

January 6, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
DAYNE BECK, Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

On September 5, 2013, defendant Dayne Beck filed a motion [Dkt. #31] to suppress all physical and testimonial evidence seized during the traffic stop of Mr. Beck on August 7, 2013. After conducting an evidentiary hearing on October 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge Leen entered her Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #44] recommending that Mr. Beck's motion be denied in part and granted in part. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Leen recommended that Beck's motion to suppress the physical evidence seized from his vehicle be denied, but that his motion to suppress his un-Mirandized statements be granted.

Beck filed an Objection to the portions of the Report and Recommendation that denied his motion. [Dkt. #48.] The Government filed a Response [Dkt. #50.][1] Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), I have conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress and related papers. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report and Recommendation is accepted and approved in its entirety. Beck's motion to suppress [Dkt. #31] is granted in part and denied in part. The physical evidence seized during the traffic stop will not be suppressed. Beck's un-Mirandized statements are suppressed.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.