Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States v. Davis
United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 19, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
PAUL EDWARD DAVIS, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On January 16, 2014, defendant Paul Edward Davis filed a motion [Dkt. #62] to suppress all physical and testimonial evidence seized during the traffic stop of Mr. Davis on July 27, 2013. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, on April 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered his Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #102] recommending that Mr. Davis' Motion to Suppress should be denied. Mr. Davis filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #114] and the Government filed a Response [Dkt. #117]. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), the court has conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress and related papers. Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #102] is accepted and approved. Judge Hoffman's Report and Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analyses and factual bases for the decision, which the Court ...