April 30, 2013
MICHAEL STEVE COX,
DWIGHT NEVEN, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Andrew P. Gordon United States District Judge
Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance (#77).
On March 19, 2013, this Court ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (#75) would be granted if plaintiff files proof that he has associated with counsel within 60 days of that Order. On March 28, 2013, plaintiff filed his Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance, seeking to stay enforcement of the March 19 Order. Plaintiff does not state how long the case should be held in abeyance, nor does he explain what act or event would trigger an end to the stay, should one be granted. Moreover, the reasons set forth in his Motion do not justify holding this matter in abeyance.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance is hereby DENIED. Plaintiff is to comply with the Court's March 19 2013 Order.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.