Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Demond Hammond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA


April 29, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEMOND HAMMOND,
DEFENDANT.

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCLOSURE OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL PSR AND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER

COMES NOW Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and PETER S. LEVITT, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and files this unopposed motion to continue the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's order of April 11, 2013. District Court Docket Number ("DC No.") 88.

Defense counsel Shari L. Kaufman, Assistant Federal Defender, advises there is no opposition to the contents of this motion.

As grounds for this motion, the Government states:

1. On March 2, 2009, this Court (Honorable Edward C. Reed, United States District Judge) sentenced Hammond to 130 months' imprisonment for offenses involving cocaine base ("crack"), under 21 U.S.C. 841(a). DC No. 77 (imposing below-guidelines sentence).

2. Hammond's projected release date is March 11, 2017. www.bob.gov http://www.bop.gov.

3. On November 1, 2011, Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines became retroactively effective. Amendment 750 reduces the base offense level for certain crimes involving crack under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) ("[I]n the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission . . . upon motion of the defendant . . . the court may reduce the term of imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent withapplicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.") (emphasis added).

4. On October 9, 2012, Hammond filed a pro per motion for a discretionary sentence reduction sentence under Amendment 750 and 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). DC No. 80. reduction under Amendment 750 and 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). DC No. 80.

5. On October 12, 2012, this case was assigned to the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, United States District Judge, for further disposition. DC No. 81.

6. On April 11, 2013, this Court ordered the Probation Office to prepare a Supplemental Presentence Report ("S-PSR") by April 30, 2013. DC No. 88. This Court also set a status conference for July 1, 2013, and set forth a briefing schedule for disposition of Hammond's motion under Section 3582(c)(2), in the event the parties were unable to reach a resolution.

7. On April 26, 2013, the Probation Officer advised the undersigned that, because Hammond was currently in transit, she (the Probation Officer) could not obtain his in-prison Progress Reports and, therefore, could not prepare a complete S-PSR.

8. The undersigned thereafter spoke to Hammond's attorney, who agreed that it is in the best interests of her client to afford the Probation Officer additional time to obtain Hammond's in-prison Progress Report and thereafter prepare the S-PSR.

9. The parties therefore request that this Court enter an Order that: (a) vacates DC No. 88; (b) orders that the S-PSR be filed by May 15, 2013; (c) orders that the briefing schedule be correspondingly adjusted to reflect the two-week continuance; and (d) resets the status conference to July 15, 2013, or to a date that is convenient for this Court.

10. Denial of this request could result in a miscarriage of justice, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

11. This is the first request for continuance herein. DATED this 29th day of April, 2013.

DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney __/s/________________ PETER S. LEVITT Assistant U.S. Attorney ORDER HAVING READ the foregoing Unopposed Motion of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, HAVING READ the foregoing Unopposed Motion of the parties, and good cause appearing IT therefore,

IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Probation Office shall have until May 15, 2013, to prepare and serve a Supplemental Presentence Report in accordance with this Court's that the Probation Office shall have until May 15, 2013, to prepare and serve a Supplemental Presentence Report in accordance with this Court's

April

IT IS 4, HEREBY

ORDERED

2013 Order

(ECF No. 84).

April

IT IS 4, FURTHER

2013 [84] Order.

ORDERED that the FPD shall have until May 29, 2013, to:

a) file a Supplement to the request for relief; or b) file a Notice of Agreed Resolution. If a Notice

of IT

IS FURTHER

Resolution ORDERED is filed, the that parties the shall

FPD have has until until May

June 29,

12, 2013,

2013to:

a) file a a

Agreed

to file

Supplement Stipulation. to the request for relief; or b) file a Notice of Agreed Resolution. If a Notice of Agreed Resolution is filed, the parties have until June 12, 2013 to file a Stipulation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a Supplement is filed, the USA shall have until

IT 26,

IS 2013,

FURTHER

to file a ORDERED

that the if a FPD

Supplement shall have is until filed, July the USA

shall

to have file a

June

Response, and

3, 2013,

until Reply.

June 26, 2013, to file a Response, and the FPD shall have until July 3, 2013, to file a Reply.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the status conference currently set in this

IT July

IS FURTHER

ORDERED

that the

status conference

and rescheduled currently to set

in this

matter for

1, 2013 at 1:30

p.m. is hereby

VACATED

July

22, 2013

matter

9:00 for a.m.

July in 1,

2013

at 1:30 p.m.

7D before is hereby the VACATED

Honorable and

Gloria rescheduled

M. Navarro, to United

July 22, States

2013

at

LV

Courtroom

District at 9:00 a.m.

Judge. in LV Courtroom 7D before the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, United States

District Judge.

M. Navarro M. Navarro

DATED this 29th day of April, 2013.

Gloria

United

States

District

Judge

United

20130429

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.