Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lance Conway v. Tom Beauclair

September 4, 2012

LANCE CONWAY WOOD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOM BEAUCLAIR, DIRECTOR OF PRISONS; KEITH YORDY, OPS; STEVE WOLFE, OPS; PHIL FOSTER, WARDEN OF IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF OROFINO (ICIO); DEAN ALLEN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF ICIO; ERIC MACEACHERN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF ICIO; SHRIVER, CAPTAIN OF ICIO; LAWANDA THOMASON, LIEUTENANT OF D.C. ICIO; KEN ALDREN, SERGEANT OF ICIO; ALIS LAHIE, SERGEANT AT ICIO; SANDRA DE MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OF ICIO; ATENCIO, DEPUTY WARDEN OF IDAHO STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JIM DORSEY, SERGEANT OF ISCI; DEBI TITUS, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR OF ICIO; HILL, DOCTOR; WHIPPLE, NURSE OF ICIO; JON-ERIC BAILLIE; VERN MCCREADY, P.A., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho William B. Shubb, Senior District Judge, Presiding No. 3:04-cv-00099-WBS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: B. Fletcher, Circuit Judge:

FOR PUBLICATION

Argued and Submitted July 9, 2012-Portland, Oregon

Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Harry Pregerson, Circuit Judges, and Donald E. Walter, District Judge.*fn1

OPINION

Opinion by Judge B. Fletcher

OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellant Lance Conway Wood is a state prisoner in Idaho. Wood allegedly engaged in a romantic, but not sexual, relationship with a female prison guard, Sandra de Martin. Wood alleges that both during and after the relationship, Martin perpetrated sexual acts on him without his consent. He filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging constitutional violations of the First, Fourth, and Eighth Amendments.

The district court granted summary judgment to defendants on Wood's Eighth Amendment claims finding that the romantic relationship between Wood and Martin was consensual and, therefore, Wood implicitly consented to Martin's sexual conduct. Having consented, the district court held, Wood could not state an Eighth Amendment claim. Wood appeals.

The appeal involves sexual abuse of prisoners by those supposed to protect them, the prison guards. Unfortunately, this is a serious problem in our prisons today but when prisoners seek redress for their abuse, often the state argues it has no liability because the prisoner consented to the sexual conduct.

As we explain more fully below, because of the enormous power imbalance between prisoners and prison guards, labeling a prisoner's decision to engage in sexual conduct in prison as "consent" is a dubious proposition.

I. Background

Wood's complaint alleged that Martin began working as a corrections officer at the prison in 2001 and that Martin started working on the unit where Wood resided in 2002. Wood alleged that Martin had a "reputation for . . . being overly friendly with the inmates." Wood tried to stay away from Martin but she pursued him. They conversed often about personal topics. Eventually, a romantic relationship developed between them. Occasionally, they would hug, kiss, and touch each other on the arms and legs, but they did not engage in sexual contact.

A few months after their relationship began, Wood started to hear rumors that Martin had gotten married. This upset Wood as his religious beliefs did not permit him to engage in adultery.

Shortly after Wood started hearing rumors that Martin was married, he asked her about it twice but she denied it each time. He decided to confront her a third time. Wood went to Martin's office and told her:

[S]he had to be honest with me. Because I did express to her before that my feelings on adultery . . . . I was kind of crushed in a way because. . . I believed that we were working on something . . . that we had a future together.

I said that we needed to back off . . . . [W]e got to stop.

He said the reason he wanted to back away was because he wanted to investigate whether she was married.

Twenty minutes later, she entered his prison cell. He described the incident as follows:

She came in to me. I mean, she came right in to me. She told me not to worry, she wasn't married. And she put - she cupped her hand on my groin . . . enough to excite me.

Wood described his response:

I pushed her away on that, literally pushed her away. . . .[I told her] "[t]his isn't the time . . . . ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.