The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge
The Plaintiff has shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its claims sufficient for the Court to issue a limited Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiff alleges copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement and inducement of copyright infringement. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) To show a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of a copyright infringement claim, Plaintiff must show that: (1) it owns the copyright to which its infringement claims relate; and, (2) Defendants violated one of the Plaintiff's exclusive rights in the works. See Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991); Latimer v. Roaring Toyz, Inc., 601 F.3d 1224, 1232-33 (11th Cir. 2010); Sid & Marty Krofft Television Prods., Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 562 F.2d 1157, 1162 (9th Cir 1977); Educational Testing Servs. v. Katzman, 793 F.2d 533, 538 (3d Cir. 1977). These two factors have been clearly established by the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff has established irreparable harm wherein there is a substantial chance that upon final resolution, the movant cannot be made whole. Plaintiff has demonstrated that Defendants are engaged in allegedly fraudulent transfers that may impinge on the Court's ability to issue effective equitable relief. See In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, Human Rights , 25 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1994) (proper to issue an injunction to keep assets from being dissipated overseas, especially where defendant had engaged in a pattern of such
The balance of equities favors the issuance of a temporary restraining order in that it is limited in scope and it does nothing more than prohibit Defendants from fraudulent transfers and compels that they unwind those in which they have already engaged. Freezing the domain names and any U.S. funds protects Plaintiff's ability to receive any possible relief. There is genuine public interest in upholding copyright protections. See Erickson v. Trinity ., 13 F.3d 1061, 1066 (7th Cir. 1994) (quoting Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240, 1255 (3d Cir. 1983) ("It is virtually axiomatic that the public interest can only be served by upholding copyright protections .")).
Finding that the Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause for the relief requested herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Any bank or financial institution in the United States with an account belonging to FF Magnat Limited, Oron.com; Maxim Bochenko, Roman Romanov, or anyone acting demonstrably in concert with them, will immediately freeze those funds from being withdrawn for a period of fourteen (14) days until a hearing on the Preliminary Injunction can be held;
2. PayPal, Inc. will immediately freeze any and all funds in any FF Magnat Limited or Oron.com accounts from being withdrawn for a period of fourteen (14) days until a hearing on Preliminary Injunction can be held;
3. CCBill, LLC will immediately freeze any and all funds in any FF Magnat Limited or Oron.com accounts from being withdrawn for a period of fourteen (14) days until a hearing on Preliminary Injunction can be held;
4. AlertPay will immediately freeze any and all funds in any FF Magnat Limited or Oron.com accounts from being withdrawn for a period of fourteen (14) days until a hearing on Preliminary Injunction can be held;
5. VeriSign will freeze the www.oron.com domain name from any further transfers;
6. All Defendants are hereby enjoined from disgorging or dissipating any funds, property, domain names, or other assets until further notice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that security pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 shall be posted immediately after entry of this Order in the amount of ONE HUNDRED ($100.00) DOLLARS AND NO CENTS.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff immediately serve the Complaint, Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, Motion For Preliminary Injunction, and copy of this Order on Defendants.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m., before the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 7D of the Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Boulevard, South, Las Vegas, Nevada, for Defendants to show cause why an Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 should not be entered granting to Plaintiff a preliminary injunction ing the relief granted by this Temporary Restraining Order. ...