Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

D. James Hadel, et al v. Willis Roof Consulting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA


February 7, 2011

D. JAMES HADEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WILLIS ROOF CONSULTING, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Chief United States District Judge Roger L. Hunt

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER (Motion to Consolidate--#266)

Earlier today, February 7, 2011, the Court inadvertently issued an order (#275) on Defendants' Motion to Consolidate (#266) before Defendants had the opportunity to file a reply. Defendants have now filed a reply (#276). The Court has considered Defendants reply and finds no reason to change its previous order (#275). Moreover, it appears from the reply that one of Defendants' purposes in seeking to consolidate the cases was to avoid Plaintiffs' efforts to remand the Second Lawsuit. A desire to avoid remand is not a proper basis on which to consolidate.

Accordingly, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order (#275), entered on February 7, 2011, is the correct and final order for Defendants' Motion to Consolidate(#266).

20110207

© 1992-2014 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.