Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pacific Coast Steel, et al v. Todd Lee Leany

January 21, 2011

PACIFIC COAST STEEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TODD LEE LEANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendants' Objection to Magistrate's Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Compel Inspection (#201). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition (#204). Objections to the magistrate judge's Order (#192) were filed pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Defendants are required to demonstrate that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The Court finds that the magistrate's Order (#192) is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). This Court does not have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. See Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus. Co. Ltd., 126 F.3d 926, 943 (7th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Objection (#201) is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Order (#192) is AFFIRMED.

20110121

© 1992-2014 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.